Policy Update
Khushi
Background
India’s public health system increasingly relies on digital platforms for service delivery, beneficiary management, disease surveillance and programme monitoring. However, different national health programmes have developed separate digital systems, creating multiple logins, repetitive data entry and fragmented information for frontline health workers (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
The Swasth Bharat Portal was launched on 30 April 2026 during the 10th National Summit on Innovation and Inclusivity, organised by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. It was developed as a one-stop aggregator that connects existing health-programme systems through an Application Programming Interface (API)-based federated architecture, rather than replacing them with a single central database (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2026).
The federated approach is particularly relevant to India’s Centre-State structure of health administration, where programmes involve different institutional and governmental levels. Instead of requiring all programme data to be consolidated into one monolithic database, interoperability allows existing systems to remain operational while enabling authorised information exchange across them.
The portal currently brings together programmes including Non-Communicable Disease services, JANANI, U-WIN, Ni-kshay, Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme and Sickle Cell Disease services (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2026).
Swasth Bharat also operates alongside the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM). ABDM’s basic objective is to create an open, interoperable and standards-based digital health ecosystem that enables secure exchange of health information while protecting privacy. Swasth Bharat supports this objective by connecting public-health programme systems with broader digital-health infrastructure, including the Ayushman Bharat Health Account (ABHA) and, progressively, the Healthcare Professionals Registry (HPR) and Health Facility Registry (HFR) (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
Thus, Swasth Bharat represents a shift from programme-specific digitalisation towards interoperable public-health infrastructure. The key policy question is whether this integration can reduce administrative fragmentation and improve public-health management while maintaining data quality, privacy, security and the institutional autonomy of participating systems.
Functioning
Swasth Bharat functions as an aggregator rather than a replacement for existing health-programme systems. Its central mechanism is an API-based federated architecture through which authorised users can access information from participating programmes through a common interface (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
1. Integration of programme systems
The portal connects multiple programme-specific systems, including Non-Communicable Disease services, JANANI, U-WIN, Ni-kshay, Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme and Sickle Cell Disease services. The individual programme systems retain their specialised functions while the portal provides a common layer for access and interoperability (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2026).
2. API-based federated interoperability
The core technical model is a federated architecture, under which participating systems communicate through APIs instead of transferring all information into a single central repository. This preserves programme-level systems while enabling controlled information exchange. Within the broader ABDM ecosystem, India has adopted Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) as an interoperability standard for exchange of healthcare information. However, the Government’s Swasth Bharat documentation does not specify that every Swasth Bharat API uses FHIR or Health Level Seven (HL7); therefore, the portal should be understood as ABDM-aligned and standards-based, rather than being described as uniformly FHIR/HL7-based. (National Health Authority, 2022)
3. Unified interface for health workers
The portal provides a common interface through which authorised health workers can access information from participating programmes. This is intended to reduce multiple logins, repetitive data entry and administrative workload (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
4. Data visualisation and monitoring
Swasth Bharat incorporates data-visualisation capabilities to support local-level monitoring, planning and evidence-based decision-making. Integrated information can allow administrators to examine programme implementation across different locations and identify areas requiring attention (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
5. Linkage with ABDM
The portal is designed to work alongside the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) and supports integration with ABHA, with progressive linkage to the HPR and HFR. ABDM itself uses common standards and a federated model to facilitate interoperable health-information exchange (Press Information Bureau, 2026; National Health Authority, 2026).
6. Basic workflow
Existing programme systems → API-based interoperability → Swasth Bharat Portal → authorised access → data visualisation → monitoring and planning
The significance of this model is that Swasth Bharat creates an interoperability layer between specialised programme systems rather than attempting to replace them with a single centralised database.
Performance
The performance of Swasth Bharat should currently be assessed through integration, system reliability and administrative efficiency, rather than long-term health outcomes. As a newly launched platform, several of the Government’s efficiency figures remain projections rather than empirically demonstrated results.
1. Expansion of programme integration
The portal has brought multiple national health programmes onto a common digital interface, including NCD services, JANANI, U-WIN, Ni-kshay, Pradhan Mantri National Dialysis Programme and Sickle Cell Disease services. This represents an important output of digital convergence (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2026).
2. Projected administrative efficiency
The Government projects approximately 20–40% reductions in data-entry effort and Human Resource duplication. These figures represent expected efficiency gains from convergence and should not be interpreted as measured reductions already achieved across the health system (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
3. Projected infrastructure efficiency
The Government also projects approximately 20–30% reduction in infrastructure requirements through greater convergence of existing systems. This remains a projected benefit requiring post-implementation evaluation (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
4. Operational performance indicators
Future performance assessment should therefore include measurable indicators such as:
- Number of registered and active users
- User load and concurrent-user capacity
- API response/latency time
- System uptime
- Crash and service-failure rates
- Successful versus failed API transactions
- Duplicate-record and deduplication rates
- Average time saved in programme reporting
- Reporting delays
- User adoption among frontline health workers
These indicators would allow a distinction between digital infrastructure being created and digital infrastructure actually performing efficiently.
Impact
The impact section should focus less on the fact that programmes are integrated, that is an intermediate process outcome already discussed under Functioning and Performance and more on what that integration could mean for health workers, beneficiaries and public-health administration.
1. Reduced administrative burden on frontline workers
A unified interface can reduce repetitive logins and duplicate data entry for ASHAs, ANMs, Community Health Officers and Medical Officers. If the Government’s projected reduction in data-entry effort is realised, time could potentially be redirected towards beneficiary interaction and service delivery rather than repetitive reporting (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
2. Better beneficiary experience
Interoperability can produce more direct benefits for patients. Where authorised information is available across programmes, beneficiaries may experience less repeated questioning, faster verification at health sub-centres and reduced need to provide the same information repeatedly.
For programmes involving maternal and child health, connected digital records can also support continuity of maternal care histories, allowing relevant information to remain available across different stages of care.
3. More responsive local health planning
Integrated programme information can give administrators a broader view of service gaps, beneficiary coverage and implementation patterns across geographical areas. This can support more evidence-based allocation of attention and resources.
4. Improved continuity of information
A connected architecture can reduce the risk that information remains confined to individual programme silos. This is particularly relevant when beneficiaries interact with multiple public-health programmes during their healthcare journey.
5. Strengthening data-driven administration
Swasth Bharat can enable administrators to move from programme-specific reporting towards cross-programme analysis, helping identify recurring gaps and implementation bottlenecks.
6. Integration with ABDM as an intermediate outcome
Its linkage with ABDM, ABHA, HPR and HFR should be treated as an intermediate digital-infrastructure outcome, rather than direct evidence of improved public health. The downstream impact will depend on whether interoperability actually improves service delivery and beneficiary experience.
Overall, the strongest potential impact of Swasth Bharat is therefore not simply the integration of databases, but the possibility that interoperability reduces administrative friction for health workers and information-related friction for beneficiaries.
Emerging Issues
1. Data privacy and security
Swasth Bharat involves the exchange of health-related and personal information across interconnected systems. Its governance should therefore be aligned with the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, alongside ABDM’s privacy and consent principles. The DPDP Act establishes a legal framework for processing digital personal data, although its provisions have a phased commencement timeline that must be taken into account when assessing present compliance (Government of India, 2023). Strong authentication, role-based access, encryption, audit trails and purpose-based data access remain essential.
2. Legacy-system interoperability
Different programme systems may contain missing metadata, inconsistent identifiers, outdated records and differently structured databases. These legacy issues can complicate cross-system queries and create errors during integration.
3. Data quality and deduplication
Connecting databases does not automatically create a single reliable beneficiary record. Duplicate entries, inconsistent identifiers and outdated information require systematic deduplication, validation and record reconciliation.
4. Digital capacity and connectivity
The effectiveness of the portal will depend on the ability of health workers and facilities to use it consistently. Connectivity limitations, inadequate hardware and differences in digital capacity can reduce the expected efficiency gains.
5. Centre–State coordination
Because health administration involves both Union and State institutions, interoperability requires clear standards, data-sharing arrangements and institutional responsibilities without unnecessarily centralising operational control.
6. Balancing standardisation with programme flexibility
Different programmes have different beneficiaries, workflows and reporting requirements. Excessive standardisation could undermine programme-specific needs, while insufficient standardisation could weaken interoperability.
7. Measuring actual efficiency gains
The projected 20–40% reduction in data-entry/HR duplication and 20–30% reduction in infrastructure requirements must be tested against actual post-implementation evidence rather than treated as established outcomes (Press Information Bureau, 2026).
8. Risk of adding another digital layer
If older applications and reporting requirements continue indefinitely alongside Swasth Bharat, the portal could unintentionally become another layer of reporting rather than a mechanism for reducing duplication.
Way Forward
1. Establish a legacy-system sunsetting and deduplication mandate
The Government should establish a formal legacy-system sunsetting and deduplication mandate. Once equivalent functions have been successfully migrated or integrated, redundant reporting interfaces should be retired according to defined timelines. At the same time, beneficiary records should undergo systematic deduplication, identifier reconciliation and metadata cleaning before legacy systems are decommissioned.
This would operationalise the objective of reducing duplication rather than simply adding Swasth Bharat to the existing digital stack.
2. Adopt common interoperability standards
Swasth Bharat should use common data standards, identifiers, API specifications and recognised health-information exchange standards across participating programmes. ABDM’s established interoperability framework, including FHIR-based standards, can provide an important reference point (National Health Authority, 2022).
3. Strengthen privacy and data governance
The platform should maintain purpose limitation, role-based access, consent mechanisms where applicable, encryption, audit trails and clear data-retention rules, with governance aligned to the DPDP Act, 2023 and ABDM’s privacy-by-design approach.
4. Build frontline capacity
Regular training for ASHAs, ANMs, Community Health Officers and Medical Officers, combined with responsive technical support, should ensure that interoperability reduces rather than increases their workload.
5. Establish measurable technical service-level indicators
The Government should publish operational indicators covering uptime, API latency, crash rates, failed transactions, concurrent-user capacity, deduplication rates and data-quality errors. This would make the technical performance of the platform independently accessible.
6. Strengthen low-connectivity functionality
Appropriate offline or low-bandwidth functionality should be developed for facilities where reliable connectivity remains a constraint, ensuring that digital integration does not interrupt frontline service delivery.
7. Evaluate beneficiary-level outcomes
Evaluation should move beyond infrastructure metrics to examine whether beneficiaries experience fewer repeated interactions, faster verification, better continuity of records and reduced administrative delays.
8. Preserve the federated governance model
The portal should maintain a common national interoperability framework while allowing programme and State systems to retain their specialised functions and institutional responsibilities. This would allow technological integration without unnecessary administrative centralisation.
9. Independently evaluate projected savings
The Government’s projected efficiency gains should be tested through periodic independent evaluations comparing baseline and post-integration data-entry time, infrastructure utilisation, HR requirements and reporting delays.
10. Build an interoperable public-health ecosystem
In the longer term, Swasth Bharat should be developed as an interoperability layer connecting public-health programmes with ABDM, ABHA, HPR and HFR, while maintaining strong privacy, security and data-quality safeguards. The objective should ultimately be interoperability that improves service delivery, rather than integration for its own sake.
References
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2026, May 6). Swasth Bharat Portal Unveiled: Unifying Fragmented Health Systems to Power India’s Digital Health Transformation. Press Information Bureau. Official PIB release – 6 May 2026
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2026). Swasth Bharat Portal. Government of India. Official Swasth Bharat Portal
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2026, May 5). Swasth Bharat Portal and Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission. Press Information Bureau. Official PIB release
National Health Authority. (2026). Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM). Government of India. Official ABDM portal
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2026). Major Programmes. Government of India. Official Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2026). Integrated Health Information Platform (IHIP). Government of India. Official IHIP portal
Government of India. (2026). Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission. National Health Authority. Official ABDM information
About the contributor
Khushi holds a Master’s degree in Sociology. She serves as a Research and Editorial Intern at IMPRI and has research interests in public policy, governance, digital transformation, and institutional reforms.
Acknowledgement
The author sincerely acknowledges the IMPRI team for their guidance, valuable feedback, and continuous support throughout the preparation of this Policy Update.
Reviewers: Anushree Khare and Sneha Kohli
Disclaimer
This article is intended for academic purposes only. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of IMPRI or any government.
Read more at IMPRI:
