Home Insights Islamabad's Measured Strikes Amidst Crisis

Islamabad's Measured Strikes Amidst Crisis


Harsh V Pant
Shivam Shekhawat

This return to business as usual is reflective of the wariness on both sides to escalate the crisis further and prevent it from metastasizing into a new front of conflict. 

Ties between Iran and Pakistan recently received an unprecedented blow. On January 16, Iran launched ‘missile and drone strikes’ on the Jaish Al Adl group—which had its hideouts in Panjgur, in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province and had previously carried out attacks inside Iran. In the days that followed, the bilateral relationship catapulted from a downgrading of the diplomatic relationship and launch of retaliatory strikes by Pakistan to finally calls for de-escalation.

The Crisis at Hand

On January 22, both sides announced the return of their ambassadors to their respective posts by the end of the week, after a telephonic conversation between the foreign ministries. The Pakistani foreign minister also extended an invitation to his Iranian counterpart, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian to pay a visit to Pakistan later this month. Both agreed to focus on resolving minor irritants through mutual trust and dialogue and use the pre-existing channels of communication to defuse any tensions. This return to business as usual is reflective of the wariness on both sides to escalate the crisis further and prevent it from metastasising into a new front of conflict. 

Deeming the strikes an ‘illegal’ and ‘unprovoked’ act targeting its sovereignty and territorial integrity, Pakistan reiterated its resolve to respond. As fears about a new conflagration erupting between the neighbours gained ground, Islamabad first recalled its ambassador and expelled the Iranian envoy, putting on hold all upcoming high-level meetings between the two sides.

It subsequently launched retaliatory strikes—‘an intelligence operation’—on the Baluchistan Liberation Front and the Baluchistan Liberation Army hideouts in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan province. While these tit-for-tat strikes heightened concerns about the two neighbours reaching a point of no return, calls for ‘de-escalation’ followed soon after with emphasis on the fraternal relations between the two countries. 

Bilateral Conflicts and Constraints over the years

Historically, both Pakistan and Iran have had differences over the presence of groups inimical to the other finding refuge within each other’s borders. The border between the two countries has seen multiple skirmishes and cross-border strikes over the years. But, for Pakistan, the timing of the recent strikes couldn’t have been more unfavourable. The last few years have seen Islamabad’s domestic situation slip from bad to worse with no respite in sight.

The ouster of Imran Khan, the attacks on symbols associated with the military, the fast deteriorating economic condition of the country, the challenge posed by the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the military’s inability to control it, the delay in the national elections—all have pushed the country over the edge. Even before the strikes, there were concerns about the successful conclusion of the elections in February. Pakistan’s domestic situation influenced its decision to cautiously flex its muscles and then ultimately call for restraint. 

With the military establishment navigating the challenges posed by the TTP in parallel with the internal turmoil in the country, the failure to launch a strong and decisive counter-attack would have further dented their prestige in the country. It would have also encouraged and nudged groups against Pakistan to ramp up their attacks. The strikes were thus aimed at giving a message: Despite its internal crisis, Pakistan wouldn’t refrain from acting when its sovereignty is undermined.

The country’s caretaker Prime Minister also had a meeting with the top civilian and military leaders to discuss the crisis and lauded the ‘professional, calibrated, and proportionate response by the armed forces of Pakistan.’ But beyond this performative muscle-flexing, Islamabad had little choice but to tame down its response. 

The Near Future

Even though Pakistan aimed to project its strength and establish its deterrence in the face of an attack, owing to its domestic and external security considerations it couldn’t afford to escalate it any further. As the crisis in West Asia continues unabated, the international community is also fearful about the prospect of the emergence of a new frontier of conflict.

With both Pakistan and Iran grappling with internal challenges and a hostile external environment, there is no appetite for a full-blown conflict for either of them. Even as the relations return to the status quo with the resumption of diplomatic engagements, the underlying issue- the proliferation of terror groups inside Pakistan- can isolate Islamabad even further and compound its difficulties.

Harsh V Pant is a Professor of International Relations at King’s College London and vice-president for studies at Observer Research Foundation (ORF)

Shivam Shekhawat is a Junior Fellow (South Asia), Observer Research Foundation (ORF)

The article was first published in Financial Express as Striking with caution: Beyond the performative muscle flexing, Islamabad had little choice on January 27, 2024.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organization.

Read more at IMPRI:

The Evolving Dynamics of India-UK Naval Engagement

Bilkis Bano Verdict: Hope for Social Justice and Women’s Rights in India

Acknowledgement: This article was posted by Ritika Sen, a research intern at IMPRI.

Previous articleClimate Change Cooperatives In Indian Agriculture – IMPRI Impact And Policy Research Institute
Next articleLegal Tussle Over Butter Chicken And Dal Makhani: Who Is The Inventor, Moti Mahal Or Daryaganj? – IMPRI Impact And Policy Research Institute
IMPRI, a startup research think tank, is a platform for pro-active, independent, non-partisan and policy-based research. It contributes to debates and deliberations for action-based solutions to a host of strategic issues. IMPRI is committed to democracy, mobilization and community building.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here