Home Insights India’s Vote – Deft or Daft Diplomacy – IMPRI Impact and Policy...

India’s Vote – Deft or Daft Diplomacy – IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute

15
0
IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute

Anil Trigunayat

Russia-Ukraine war is touching everyone in different ways as the already stressed global world order goes through a premediated churn. As if the COVID-19 pandemic was not enough, geopolitics between Moscow and Washington has begun to impact ordinary lives in myriad ways as the prices and uncertainty of energy, oil and gas, wheat and food products are hitting the roof. As the Trans-Atlantic alliance has woken up from being ‘brain dead, the Sino-Russian axis is tying the knot even more strongly.

India – the largest democracy, second largest population threatening to surpass China in a decade or two, a fastest-growing major economy that could become number three in some time and above all a large and growing market including for defence has been put in a cage by countries, on its decision to abstain on the vote in the UNSC, UNGA and elsewhere to condemn Russian aggression against Ukraine.

Most of the criticism levelled against India comes out of the alliance and myopic mindset since people tend to look at an incident in isolation and not in its entirety. They don’t even want to look back at the mayhem caused by US and NATO invasions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen because those are expandable people and geographies, ‘refugees ‘vs’ migrants’. No one in their right mind should belittle the humanitarian disaster that is unfolding in Ukraine and the flood of over 2.7 million refugees in the neighbouring East European NATO countries whose economies and capacities are being stretched to the limit. The refugee crisis will be a major challenge for the West going forward.

What did India say by abstaining? It has never supported any unilateral external military intervention in any theatre of war and has expressed her displeasure overtly or covertly and worked behind the scenes to defuse the crisis and conflict at all times. In this case, also it recognized the plight of ordinary Ukrainians and provided humanitarian assistance at the earliest. At the UNSC and other fora be it UNGA, UNHRC, IAEA it called for sanity. It called for direct dialogue between the warring sides. It lamented that diplomacy was not allowed to work and was prematurely abandoned by the two sides who did not seem ready to accommodate one another’s genuine concerns. It wants diplomacy to resume and the Indian PM Narendra Modi has unequivocally spoken to the Russian, Ukrainian and other world leaders. This is not being neutral. This is being positive and constructive.

What is wrong if India’s sole sane voice asks for respect of sovereignty and territorial integrity in accordance with international rule of law and UN charter while urging the side to respect each other’s genuine security concerns. India supports all efforts made by various countries to assist in reducing tensions and hostilities. Being in a unique position of having a friendship with all the parties to the conflict or the ones directly affected in this crisis, New Delhi could have offered to host the talks. The fact is that PM Modi spoke to 11 leaders from all sides including those of the Quad. That is not being neutral or insensitive.

Every country also has to safeguard its own national interests. We are no different. The presence of more than 20000 Indians including a large number of students caught in the war zone was a major concern and their safe evacuation was a paramount priority for the Indian government. Fortunately, precisely due to its policies and relations, India was able to successfully extract all of her citizens except one who was caught in the crossfire. ‘Operation Ganga’ once again was a remarkable success. India has a history and expertise in evacuations of not only her own citizens but from other countries too.

Even though many western countries and Ukraine’s leadership and Ambassador in Delhi may have expressed their public displeasure with India’s stand, they did understand the value of Indian clout with President Putin. Russia and India are special and privileged strategic partners with tremendous mutual trust at all levels. No doubt President Zelensky requested PM Modi to impress upon President Putin for a dialogue, which he did. PM Modi does have an excellent personal rapport with Putin. As per reports and efforts by India and several other countries like Israel and France, some thaw and hope are being witnessed.

It is a fact that the skyrocketing oil and gas prices will have a direct impact on India’s economic growth trajectory as it imports nearly 85% of its requirements. Not much comes directly from Russia even though Indian companies have stakes in Rosneft and others, but the Russian Dy PM only last week offered the oil and gas to India at discounted rates and sought greater investments in the ongoing and new projects. Russia also has huge quantities of rare earth like molybdenum and neon that could be useful for the development of the semiconductor industry and help India in its Atmanirbhar campaign.

The brass-tacks will be the impact of sweeping sanctions on Russia and the probable use of CAATSA like laws by the US. One will have to brace against these through negotiations and by being innovative. Sanctions in this case will be mutually destructive for the Russians and Europeans, especially after countermeasures by the Russians against the Europeans. Since Americans and the west are using financial instruments as weapons in this war while pumping in arms into hapless Ukraine, ‘the sacrificial goat’, it will not be long before alternative counter financial mechanisms and institutions garnered by even the weakened Russians and the robust Chinese will combine to create a viable alternative.

As India is unlikely to go with either bloc as the Cold War 2.0 ensues and would continue its equanimous benevolent approach and multidimensional relationship and multi alignment matrix, she may be able to provide leadership to a very large number of countries who are waiting for a viable grouping which can exercise its strategic autonomy. India is adept at wading through these crises and can work in tandem with its ‘Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam’ philosophy which seeks coexistence and not confrontation.  Finally, India will have to learn to leverage its own strengths to its own advantage.

First published in the Chanakya Forum, India’s Vote – Deft or Daft Diplomacy, on March 15, 2022.

About the Author

Anil Trigunayat, former Indian Ambassador to Jordan, Libya and Malta; Distinguished Fellow and Head of the West Asia Experts Group at the Vivekananda International Foundation

Previous articleReview of Delhi’s ties with Moscow – IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute
Next articleStreamlining to energize the sluggish real estate sector – IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute
IMPRI, a startup research think tank, is a platform for pro-active, independent, non-partisan and policy-based research. It contributes to debates and deliberations for action-based solutions to a host of strategic issues. IMPRI is committed to democracy, mobilization and community building.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here