Policy Update
Arjya Shree Pande
Background
The Assistance to Deserted Indian Women Scheme was introduced to address the distress faced by Indian women abandoned by Non-Resident Indian (NRI) or foreign spouses. It is a welfare measure that supports women through local Indian community organisations, women’s groups, and NGOs empanelled with Indian Missions, supplemented by limited government funding (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011). Many such women encountered financial hardship, lack of legal support, and difficulties in accessing counselling or filing cases for maintenance, alimony, or divorce in foreign jurisdictions (Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2014).
Policy inception took place in February 2007, when the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs launched the original scheme. It provided limited legal and financial assistance of US$ 1,500 per case through Indian Missions and Posts abroad to women deserted by their overseas Indian husbands (Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs).
Need and rationale arose from the growing incidence of desertion, defined as voluntary abandonment by the husband or circumstances compelling the wife to leave the matrimonial home without reasonable cause, often accompanied by non-support. These women, typically Indian passport holders, required community mobilisation and government financial help to obtain counselling and legal services (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
Target beneficiaries are Indian passport holders whose marriage was solemnised in India or overseas with an overseas Indian (NRI/PIO) or foreigner (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).The Assistance to Deserted Indian Women Scheme, revised in 2011 and later merged into the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF).
Eligibility under this scheme requires that the woman has been deserted in India or overseas within fifteen years of the marriage, or that divorce proceedings have been initiated by the husband within fifteen years, or that an ex-parte divorce has been obtained by the husband within twenty years and a case for maintenance and alimony is to be filed (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
The woman’s place of residence is irrelevant, she may be residing in India or abroad at the time of application. Preference is given on the basis of financial need, and the scheme is generally not available to women against whom a criminal case has been decided, with limited exception for parental child abduction charges where custody remains undecided (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
Functioning
The Assistance to Deserted Indian Women Scheme operates by providing limited financial support for counselling and legal services to eligible Indian women deserted by overseas Indian or foreigner husbands. The institutional framework centres on Indian Missions and Posts abroad as the primary implementing agencies and applications are submitted to the concerned Indian Mission/Post abroad or to the Ministry of External Affairs.
These are examined on a case-to-case basis by a designated officer and approved by the Head of Mission or Deputy Chief of Mission. Assistance is then released directly to empanelled legal counsel or through Indian Community Associations, Women’s organisations, or NGOs for documentation and preparatory work related to filing cases and to deliver counselling and legal services for documentation and preparatory work (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
Preference is given on the basis of financial need. The Ministry of External Affairs provides overall policy direction, while coordination with bodies such as the National Commission for Women has been envisaged for handling related complaints (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011; Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012). Implementation occurs through Heads of Missions/Posts, who hold discretionary powers under the revised scheme to disburse assistance. Empanelled organisations are encouraged to secure additional pro-bono legal support (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
The scheme began in 2007, it was comprehensively revised and liberalised with effect from 30 November 2011. Under the 2011 revision, the assistance amount was increased to US$ 3,000 per case in developed countries and US$ 2,000 per case in developing countries, eligibility was extended to women domiciled in India after desertion, and the scheme was implemented in 13 countries (Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Kuwait, Malaysia, New Zealand, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, UK and USA). Complementary support is also extended through the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF) (Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2014; Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2015).
From 1 September 2017, the standalone scheme was merged into the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF). The benefit was extended to all Indian Missions and Posts abroad, and the quantum of assistance was raised to US$ 4,000 per case (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011; Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2014; Ministry of External Affairs, 2021).
Progress has been modest. Early data indicated low utilisation, with only a small percentage of allocated funds spent and limited beneficiaries relative to complaints received. Later reports showed some improvement in utilisation after the 2011 revisions, and assistance continued to be provided through Missions, with numbers of beneficiaries remaining relatively low compared to the scale of reported cases (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012; Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2015).
Secondary literature and parliamentary evaluations highlight key concerns: inadequate quantum of assistance relative to high legal costs in foreign jurisdictions, low fund utilisation due to difficulties in empanelling suitable NGOs, limited awareness, weak coordination among agencies (including with the National Commission for Women), and insufficient coverage relative to the number of complaints. These issues have constrained the scheme’s overall effectiveness despite its welfare intent (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012).
Performance
Performance assessment of the Assistance to Deserted Indian Women Scheme, over the last 5 years relies primarily on parliamentary replies, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) updates, and Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF) data, as dedicated Programme (MIS) Management Information System dashboards, standalone Union Budget allocations, Economic Survey references, detailed Ministry annual report break-ups, Cabinet notes, or CAG audits specific to this scheme are not prominently available in public government records.
Under ICWF, official figures show limited uptake of the specific “assistance to Indian women deserted by their overseas Indian/foreigner husbands” category: 2 beneficiaries in 2022, 5 in 2023, and 15 in 2024 (Ministry of External Affairs, 2025). Overall ICWF support for distressed Indians remains far higher, but the deserted-women component constitutes a small fraction. Complementary data indicate broader assistance: MEA reported support to 1,871 distressed or abandoned Indian women abroad in recent parliamentary disclosures, with the highest numbers in Dubai (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024).
Between January 2020 and October 2023, 5,339 requests for support from estranged Indian women married to overseas Indians were received (Ministry of External Affairs, 2023). In the five years preceding one 2025 reply, 1,617 complaints were recorded from NRI women allegedly abandoned by spouses abroad (Ministry of External Affairs, 2025).
Figure 1
Source: Adapted by the author from Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India (2021, February 10). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1427: Legal Assistance to Women.
Here, Figure 1 is providing data on the number of Indian women who received legal assistance under the scheme during the last three years.
Chart 1
| Year | Number of women who received assistance | Source |
| 2011-12 | 15 | PIB / Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (2014) |
| 2012-13 | 22 | PIB / Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (2014) |
| 2013-14 | 30 | PIB / Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (2014) |
| 2012 to March 2016 (cumulative approx.) | Around 80 – 127 | Lok Sabha replies (2017) |
Source: Adapted by the author from the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs / Press Information Bureau. (2014, July 9)
Here, Chart 1 which is under the original Scheme (pre-ICWF merger), shows the number of women who received assistance under the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs for legal/financial assistance to Indian women deserted by their overseas Indian/foreigner husbands during 2011-16, as reported by the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs.
Chart 2
| Year | Number of women assisted under the specific “deserted women” head (ICWF) | Source |
| Since 2015 upto early 2021, (cumulative) | 175 women assisted (out of 216 requests) | Rajya Sabha (February 2021) |
| 2017 – 2020 (Approx.) | 60 | Lok Sabha (February 2021) |
| 2022 | 2 | Ministry of External Affairs (Lok Sabha, March 2025) |
| 2023 | 5 | Ministry of External Affairs (Lok Sabha, March 2025) |
| 2024 | 15 | Ministry of External Affairs (Lok Sabha, March 2025) |
Source: Adapted by the author from the Ministry of External Affairs.
Here, chart 2, represents the data on the number of requests received and women assisted under the (ICWF) for legal and financial assistance to deserted Indian women since 2017 (post-merger period).
Although thousands of complaints and requests for support are received every year from Indian women deserted by their overseas spouses, the number of formal financial beneficiaries under the scheme remains very low. Most of the support provided by Indian Missions consists of counselling, guidance, referral to lawyers or NGOs, help with legal summons, and open-house meetings, which do not involve release of funds under the specific scheme head.
Only those cases that strictly meet the eligibility criteria and where the woman decides to pursue legal proceedings abroad receive the sanctioned financial assistance. Many women either return to India, reconcile after counselling, or withdraw their applications. Procedural delays, difficulty in empanelling suitable legal counsel or NGOs, and limited awareness further restrict formal disbursements. As a result, while overall assistance to distressed women is significant, the actual number of women receiving the scheme’s financial grant stays limited.
Trend analysis reveals a persistent gap between complaints received and formal financial assistance disbursed under the dedicated head. Requests have remained in the thousands annually, yet specific scheme/ICWF payouts for deserted women stay in single or low double digits. Sectoral analysis shows concentration in Gulf Missions (particularly UAE) and a few other high-diaspora posts, consistent with earlier patterns. State-wise analysis is constrained because MEA does not maintain state-wise beneficiary data for overseas assistance (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; 2025). Comparative analysis with earlier periods (pre-2017) indicates that while the 2011 revision and 2017 ICWF expansion improved flexibility and geographic coverage, absolute numbers of formal financial beneficiaries have not scaled proportionally with reported grievances.
Parliamentary Committee reports from earlier years had already flagged low utilisation and limited reach; recent MEA statements confirm continued reliance on counselling, open-house meetings, MADAD/CPGRAMS portals, 24×7 helplines, empanelled NGOs/lawyers, and emerging One Stop Centres in select Missions under the Nirbhaya Fund, rather than large-scale scheme-specific disbursements (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; Press Information Bureau, 2024). Overall, evidence points to steady operational activity and multi-channel support, but modest performance on quantifiable financial assistance relative to the volume of cases.
Impact
Official evidence indicates partial achievement. The scheme and its successor mechanisms under the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF) have enabled counselling, guidance, and limited legal/financial support through Indian Missions/Posts. Early data showed more than 450 women assisted across 2010–13 via the scheme, Missions, and ICWF (Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, 2014). More recent parliamentary disclosures record assistance to 1,871 distressed or abandoned Indian women abroad, along with thousands of complaints addressed through multi-channel support including MADAD, helplines, open-house meetings, and empanelled NGOs/lawyers (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024). The 2011 revisions expanded eligibility, raised assistance ceilings, and improved operational flexibility, contributing to some utilisation gains noted in Standing Committee action-taken replies (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012).
Since 2015, the scheme and its successor mechanism under ICWF have enabled formal legal and financial assistance to 175 women against 216 requests received, with an expenditure of approximately ₹63.71 lakh. During the same period, 382 passports of erring overseas spouses were revoked or impounded by Regional Passport Offices and Indian Missions, demonstrating a tangible deterrent and supportive impact beyond direct financial aid (Ministry of External Affairs, 2021).
However, quantifiable financial assistance under the specific deserted women head remains modest relative to demand. Parliamentary Committee reviews earlier highlighted low fund utilisation, limited NGO empanelment, and coordination gaps with the National Commission for Women, constraining scale (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012).
Overall, the policy has delivered incremental support and institutional mechanisms consistent with its welfare objectives, yet the gap between reported need and formal financial assistance indicates that intended impact has been only partially realised. Complementary measures such as One Stop Centres in select Missions represent ongoing efforts to strengthen outcomes (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; Press Information Bureau, 2024).
Emerging Issues
Limited Scale of Financial Assistance Relative to Demand:
Despite revisions in 2011 and subsequent integration with the (ICWF), formal financial assistance under the deserted-women category remains modest. Recent figures show only 2, 5, and 15 beneficiaries in 2022, 2023, and 2024 respectively, while thousands of complaints and requests continue to be received annually (Ministry of External Affairs, 2025; Ministry of External Affairs, 2023). This gap between reported need and disbursed support raises questions about the adequacy of the scheme’s design and financing in addressing the scale of desertion cases.
Low Utilisation and Implementation Constraints:
Parliamentary reviews have repeatedly noted low fund utilisation, difficulties in empanelling suitable NGOs and legal counsel, and limited outreach in certain Missions. Early assessments recorded utilisation rates as low as 2–10 per cent in some years, with only a fraction of complaints translating into formal assistance (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012). These constraints persist in the broader ICWF framework, affecting consistent delivery of counselling and legal services.
Weak Monitoring and Absence of Comprehensive Data:
The Ministry of External Affairs does not maintain state-wise beneficiary data for overseas assistance, and no dedicated Programme MIS or public dashboard tracks scheme-specific outcomes in real time (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; 2025). This limits systematic trend analysis, impact evaluation, and evidence-based refinements. Lack of independent assessments further restricts accountability.
Institutional Coordination Gaps:
Earlier Standing Committee reports highlighted insufficient coordination between the nodal Ministry, the National Commission for Women (NRI Cell), and other agencies. Despite the constitution of inter-ministerial mechanisms, overlapping roles and limited dedicated resources for the NRI Cell constrained effective case handling and follow-up (Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012). Similar coordination challenges continue to affect seamless support for women domiciled in India versus those abroad.
Inclusion and Awareness Barriers:
Eligibility and application processes, while liberalised, still depend heavily on awareness and access through Missions or portals such as MADAD. Women in remote areas or with limited digital literacy may face barriers, and the scheme’s focus on initial documentation costs leaves longer-term legal and rehabilitation needs only partially addressed (Ministry of External Affairs, 2011; Ministry of External Affairs, 2024).
Way Forward
Strengthening Financial Support and Coverage:
To enhance the scheme’s effectiveness, the quantum of assistance under the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF) for deserted Indian women could be periodically reviewed and aligned with rising legal costs in key jurisdictions. Expanding dedicated allocations and ensuring timely disbursement would enable more women to access counselling and legal services, thereby supporting the broader goal of women’s economic security and social protection under India’s development agenda (Ministry of External Affairs, 2025; Ministry of External Affairs, 2011).
Improving Implementation and Outreach:
Missions and Posts may intensify efforts to empanel a wider network of credible NGOs, women’s organisations, and pro-bono legal counsel, particularly in high-caseload countries. Greater use of open-house meetings, consular camps, and community associations can improve awareness and accessibility. Linking these efforts with existing platforms such as MADAD and 24×7 helplines would facilitate quicker grievance redressal and reinforce inclusive service delivery (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024).
Enhancing Monitoring and Data Systems:
Development of a dedicated monitoring framework, including real-time tracking of applications, disbursements, and outcomes, would strengthen accountability and evidence-based decision-making. Maintaining disaggregated data (including by country and, where feasible, by state of origin) would support better planning and evaluation, contributing to transparent governance priorities (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; 2025).
Deepening Institutional Coordination:
Closer coordination between the Ministry of External Affairs, the National Commission for Women, State Governments, and Missions abroad can ensure seamless support for women both in India and overseas. Strengthening the role of inter-ministerial mechanisms and integrating scheme support with emerging One Stop Centres in select Missions would create a more comprehensive continuum of care (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; Standing Committee on External Affairs, 2012).
Aligning with National Priorities:
These measures would advance India’s commitments to women’s empowerment, social justice, and diaspora welfare. By enabling deserted women to secure legal remedies and rebuild livelihoods, the strengthened framework can contribute to reduced vulnerability, greater gender equity, and inclusive development outcomes consistent with national policy goals (Ministry of External Affairs, 2024; Press Information Bureau, 2024).
References
Ministry of External Affairs. (2011). MOIA’s Scheme for giving legal / financial assistance to Indian women deserted by their overseas Indian / foreigner husbands (revised w.e.f. 30th November 2011). https://mea.gov.in/images/pdf/the-scheme-new.pdf
Ministry of External Affairs. (2015, December 16). Scheme for legal/financial assistance to Indian women deserted by their overseas Indian spouse. Press Information Bureau. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=133365
Ministry of External Affairs. (2016). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1653: Assistance to women in distress. https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/26744/QUESTION_NO1653_ASSISTANCE_TO_WOMEN_IN_DISTRESS
Ministry of External Affairs. (2017, December 20). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 891: Legal assistance to women. https://sansad.in/getFile/loksabhaquestions/annex/13/AU891.pdf?source=pqals
Ministry of External Affairs. (2021, February 4). Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 397: Special scheme for legal and financial assistance to Indian women married to overseas Indians. https://mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/33463/QUESTION+NO397+SPECIAL+SCHEME+FOR+LEGAL+AND+FINANCIAL+ASSISTANCE+TO+INDIAN+WOMEN+MARRIED+TO+OVERSEAS+INDIANS
Ministry of External Affairs. (2021, February 10). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1427: Legal assistance to women. https://www.mea.gov.in/lok-sabha.htm?dtl/33490/QUESTION_NO1427_LEGAL_
Ministry of External Affairs. (2023). Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2139: Support to Indian women estranged by their husbands abroad. https://www.mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/37463/QUESTION_NO2139_SUPPORT_TO_INDIAN_WOMEN_ESTRANGED_BY_THEIR_HUSBANDS_ABROAD
Ministry of External Affairs. (2024). Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1191: Distraught and abandoned Indian women. https://www.mea.gov.in/rajya-sabha.htm?dtl/38680/QUESTION+NO+1191+DISTRAUGHT+AND+ABANDONED+INDIAN+WOMEN
Ministry of External Affairs. (2025). Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 3678: New scheme for Indians abroad (ICWF beneficiary data). https://sansad.in/getFile/loksabhaquestions/annex/184/AU3678_TlObFO.pdf?source=pqals
Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs. (2014, February 18). Measures for redressal of grievances of Indian women deserted by overseas spouses. Press Information Bureau. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=103861
Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs. (2014, July 9). Legal assistance to abandoned women. Press Information Bureau. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=106334
About the contributor
Arjya Shree Pande is a Research and Editorial Intern at IMPRI. She is currently pursuing a Masters in Sociology and Advanced Post Graduate Diplomas in Communication for Social Behaviour Change, technical support (UNICEF) and Global Politics. She is seeking analytical, policy, or programme oriented roles in international, governmental, or development settings where she wants her experience in research, behavioural insights, and governance expertise can be applied to evidence based decision making, public service delivery, and technology enabled social impact.
Acknowledgments
The author sincerely expresses gratitude to the reviewers ( Karnavi Shende, Nivedya Murali ), IMPRI India and the editorial team for their valuable comments, constructive suggestions, and continuous guidance throughout the preparation of this article.
Disclaimer
All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organisation.
Read more at IMPRI:
Kerala’s K-AI Initiative: AI for Governance under Kerala Artificial Intelligence Mission (K-AIM)


















