Policy Update
Shivanshi
Background
Diplomatic relations between India and France date to 1947, and the bilateral Strategic Partnership, India’s first with a Western power, was established in 1998, anchored on non-interference in internal affairs, strategic autonomy, and independence from each other’s military alliances. Recognising 25 years of that partnership in 2023, both countries adopted the Horizon 2047 Roadmap to guide bilateral cooperation. On 17 February 2026, during President Macron’s visit to India for the AI Impact Summit, the two leaders elevated ties to a “Special Global Strategic Partnership” and jointly inaugurated the India-France Year of Innovation 2026, calling for expanded cooperation across artificial intelligence, research, technology, digital and cyber space, health, culture, and education (PIB, 2026a). Building on this and on the shared innovation trajectories of the two countries, Prime Minister Modi and President Macron met again at Villa Kerylos, Nice, on 14 June 2026, where they formally adopted the India-France Innovation Roadmap 2030 (MEA, 2026). The Roadmap explicitly grounds itself in convergence between India’s Viksit Bharat 2047 vision and France’s France 2030 strategy, framing innovation as central to economic resilience, strategic autonomy, and technological sovereignty for both countries (MEA, 2026).
France’s specific weight in India’s foreign-policy calculus is not incidental. Since the Cold War, the relationship has rested on a shared commitment to strategic autonomy: India used non-alignment to preserve sovereign choice despite proximity to the Soviet Union, while France particularly under Charles de Gaulle asserted independence from US-led blocs even as a NATO and EU member. This convergence gave India access to advanced Western technology, particularly in defence and civil nuclear energy, without the ideological conditions attached to Cold War-era alignment, while France gained a large, non-aligned Indo-Pacific partner reinforcing its own quest for strategic autonomy. France is also a resident Indo-Pacific power with overseas territories (Réunion, Mayotte) and a standing military presence in the region, and has been a consistent supporter of India’s bid for permanent UNSC membership, reiterated most recently in the February 2026 Joint Statement (PIB, 2026a). These factors make France distinct among India’s European partners: a permanent Security Council member, a nuclear-armed state, and the EU’s most defence-forward country for India, combined in a single bilateral relationship not bound by NATO or EU-bloc obligations.
Functioning
The Roadmap is structured around four pillars rather than a single implementing body, each carrying its own institutional mechanisms (MEA, 2026).
Pillar I – Trusted AI builds on the India-France Declaration on Artificial Intelligence (February 2025) and the AI Action and Impact Summits hosted by the two countries in 2025 and 2026. It commits both sides to interoperable, risk-based AI governance aligned with democratic values and human rights, and notably designates child safety online as a priority area, building on the Expert Engagement Group on AI and Child Safety convened at the 2026 AI Impact Summit, with a focus on privacy-preserving age assurance and safety-by-design standards. This pillar also links India’s Data Empowerment and Protection Architecture (DEPA) with France’s trusted data-space and health-data-platform work to support consent-based data flows for research and public services.
Pillar II – Academic and people-to-people mobility builds on France’s target of hosting 30,000 Indian students by 2030 (up from roughly 10,000 today), and revisits the 2018 India-France Mutual Recognition of Qualifications (MRQ) agreement, the first such agreement India signed with any country with a view to expanding it to more disciplines, regulated professions, and emerging-technology domains, including dual-degree and joint doctoral supervision arrangements.
Pillar III – Technological sovereignty via industry-academia linkages centres on CEFIPRA (the Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research, jointly funded since 1987), the India-France Innovation Network (IFIN) with a proposed joint Indo-French steering committee for its governance and the Franco-Indian Campus in Life Sciences for Health. It also introduces two new instruments: a Franco-Indian Campus for Aeronautics Training and Careers in Kanpur (with India’s Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship), and the India-France InnoXchange Bridge, envisaged as a structured start-up and research-entrepreneurship corridor offering reciprocal lab access, research residencies, and “soft landings” for start-ups in each other’s ecosystems. Space cooperation is folded into this pillar too, anchored around two back-to-back events in September 2026, the Bengaluru Space Expo and the International Space Summit in Paris intended to deepen cooperation on Earth observation, human spaceflight, and India’s planned Low Earth Orbit space station.
Pillar IV – AI and research-based solutions for global health challenges builds on the existing ICMR–Health Data Hub pilot, committing both sides to consent-based, interoperable data-sharing architectures that could eventually be extended to Global South partners.
Alongside these four pillars, the Roadmap’s annex lists nineteen institution-level agreements signed in Nice on 15 June 2026, giving the framework immediate, concrete uptake at the academic and industrial level (MEA, 2026).
Role of French and EU institutional funds: Financing for this ecosystem does not run through the Roadmap alone. The Agence Française de Développement (AFD) has been a development partner in India since 2008, operating through sovereign and sub-sovereign loans plus technical assistance for sustainable urban development, energy transition, and ecological preservation (AFD, n.d.); the June 2026 Joint Statement separately notes discussions between NITI Aayog and the AFD Group on macroeconomic modelling of India’s energy transition (PIB, 2026a). A parallel EU-level funding track is also opening: in February 2026, India and the EU launched exploratory talks, moving to formal negotiations from July 2026 on India’s association with Horizon Europe, the EU’s flagship €93.5 billion research and innovation programme, which would let Indian institutions receive direct EU grants rather than relying solely on India’s existing Co-Funding Mechanism (European Commission, 2026). Since major French research bodies such as CNRS and CEA, both named as India’s Pillar III partners are themselves large Horizon Europe beneficiaries, this EU-level track is a funding architecture the bilateral Roadmap can plug into, even though it is negotiated separately at the India-EU level.
What CEFIPRA specifically finances: As the pillar’s backbone institution, CEFIPRA (jointly funded by India’s DST and France’s Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs at roughly €3.1 million a year since 1987) runs two principal financing tracks: the Collaborative Scientific Research Programme (CSRP), funding joint basic/applied-science projects, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biotechnology, environmental and computational sciences, water research, up to €220,000 per project, open to permanent researchers at Indian and French universities or R&D institutions; and the Industry-Academia Research & Development Programme (IARDP), funding up to €300,000 for projects following a “2+2” model requiring at least one industrial partner and one research institute from each country. Since 1987, CEFIPRA has supported over 550 collaborative research projects, 169 joint seminars, 37 industrial projects, and more than 3,650 researcher and student mobility visits (French Institute in India, n.d.).
Performance
Measured in institutional terms, the Roadmap’s first output is unusually dense: nineteen institutional agreements were concluded alongside the Roadmap, spanning six Indian institutions namely IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi, IIT Gandhinagar, IIT Tirupati, IIT Hyderabad, and IIT Madras, plus IISc Bengaluru and a comparable range of French partners. IIT Bombay alone concluded three agreements (with Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, and Université Côte d’Azur, Nice) covering translation, incubation and acceleration cooperation. IIT Delhi signed three separate innovation-and-entrepreneurship partnerships focused on energy, sustainability and climate change, with FITT (its own technology-transfer foundation) paired against three different French entities – Racines de France, DDI (Descartes Développement & Innovation), and G2i Venture Management’s French arm, SC Conseil. IIT Madras alone accounts for six agreements, five student-exchange agreements (with Université de Limoges, ESCP Business School, Clermont Auvergne INP, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, and CentraleSupélec Université Paris-Saclay, two of them renewals) and one academic-collaboration-cum-exchange agreement. Defence-linked industrial ties feature too: IIT Tirupati signed a strategic academia-industry partnership with Safran Electronics & Defense on Positioning, Navigation and Timing, while CYRAN AI and Safran Aircraft Engines signed a separate MoU. IIT Hyderabad partnered with Dassault Systèmes and Crimson Energy Experts on 3D computing systems, and IIT Gandhinagar signed an Expression of Interest on mobility, AI, and smart-transportation research. A broader Declaration of Intention brings the IITs, IISc, and the French UDICE university network into a standing academic-collaboration framework. On funding infrastructure, CEFIPRA, the pillar-III backbone has supported over 550 collaborative research projects and more than 3,650 researcher and student exchanges since 1987, funding individual projects up to €220,000 (French Institute in India, n.d.). Bilateral trade stood at roughly US$15.8 billion in FY 2025–26, with France as India’s 11th-largest FDI source, cumulative inflows of about US$11.9 billion since 2000, and over 1,000 French establishments operating in India (IBEF, 2026).
Impact
The Roadmap’s most tangible near-term impact is the shift from government-to-government declarations toward institution-to-institution commitments carrying their own budgets and timelines, the nineteen annexed agreements being a direct output rather than an aspiration. The Trusted AI pillar’s inclusion of child-safety-online commitments is a notable first for an India-France technology text. The InnoXchange Bridge and Kanpur aeronautics campus translate broad “innovation partnership” language into named, locatable projects.
What India gains: The Roadmap’s own text frames cooperation as co-development rather than one-way transfer: the Joint Advanced Technology Development Group, agreed in the February 2026 Joint Statement, was constituted specifically to explore opportunities to co-develop emerging and critical technologies in identified niche areas, in order to retain a competitive military edge and mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities (PIB, 2026a). This model is already visible in concluded projects, the Technical Arrangement for cooperation in defence technologies signed between DRDO and DGA in November 2025, and the H125 helicopter Final Assembly Line, a Tata Advanced Systems–Airbus joint venture that both governments describe as a historic Make in India milestone building domestic manufacturing capacity rather than a straightforward purchase (PIB, 2026a). This directly serves the objective both leaders set for the elevated partnership: to reinforce India and France’s “sovereignty and decision-making autonomy” (PIB, 2026a), a framing the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs also uses in describing the strategic component of the relationship as a means for both countries “to ensure their strategic independence, including by reducing their dependence on third countries” (French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, n.d.).
France’s specific weight in India’s foreign-policy calculus is reflected in how the two governments themselves describe the relationship. The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs characterises the “strategic” component of the partnership covering defence, civil nuclear energy, space, and security as requiring high levels of mutual trust and “a shared desire for a partnership of equals” (French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, n.d.). Both governments have reaffirmed this at the highest level: the February 2026 Joint Statement records the elevation to a Special Global Strategic Partnership as intended to reinforce both countries’ sovereignty and decision-making autonomy, and reiterates France’s “firm support for India’s permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council” (PIB, 2026a). This combination of defence co-development, civil nuclear cooperation, and explicit UNSC backing, jointly affirmed at head-of-state level, is not repeated to the same degree in India’s public statements with most other European partners.
France as India’s gateway into the EU: Because France is the EU’s leading military and nuclear power and a permanent UNSC member, the bilateral Roadmap functions as India’s most consequential entry point into deeper EU-level engagement, rather than a purely bilateral track. Its provisions align with two separate but related developments: the concluded (though not yet implemented) India-EU Free Trade Agreement, and the ongoing negotiations, launched February 2026, moving to formal talks from July 2026 on India’s association with Horizon Europe (European Commission, 2026). If concluded, the association would let Indian institutions receive Horizon Europe grants directly and lead collaborative research groups consortia on the same terms as EU member states, rather than depending on India’s own Co-Funding Mechanism as at present (European Commission, 2026). Since French institutions are core partners in the bilateral Roadmap’s Pillar III and simultaneously major Horizon Europe recipients, the France-specific relationship functions as a proving ground and entry ramp for the larger EU-India science and innovation relationship that is still being negotiated.
Emerging Issues
Trade-institution gap: nineteen new agreements and four Roadmap pillars are backed by bilateral trade of only about US$15.8 billion (IBEF, 2026), modest relative to the strategic and institutional density of the relationship.
Funding gaps: CEFIPRA’s per-project ceilings (€220,000–€300,000) are small relative to Horizon Europe’s €93.5 billion scale that India is separately negotiating access to, meaning bilateral France-India funding may struggle to support larger joint infrastructure or platform-level projects without EU-level funding eventually layering on top.
Research-to-commercialisation gap: much of the CEFIPRA and IIT-France portfolio remains concentrated in pre-competitive, academic-stage research; the IARDP’s industry-pairing requirement and the proposed InnoXchange Bridge are designed to bridge this but are new and as yet unproven at scale.
Unspecified terms for co-development: the Joint Advanced Technology Development Group’s mandate to “co-develop emerging and critical technologies in identified niche areas” (PIB, 2026a) is stated at a general level in the public joint statements; the terms governing industrial participation, design/development responsibilities, and intellectual-property arrangements for specific projects are not detailed in the available official record, which will need to be resolved project-by-project as co-development moves into more sensitive sectors.
Geopolitical risk and priority mismatch: France’s immediate security focus remains anchored in continental Europe and Francophone Africa, while India’s is anchored in the Himalayas and the Indian Ocean Region; the February 2026 Joint Statement itself notes that India’s sustained strategic engagement with Russia “occasionally friction-tests European diplomatic sensitivities” (PIB, 2026a), a live constraint on how far coordination can extend, particularly on export-control and dual-use technology questions.
Institutional concentration: of the nineteen annexed agreements, a large majority involve a small set of IITs (Bombay, Delhi, Madras) and IISc; broadening participation to other Indian universities and research institutions would deepen the innovation ecosystem the Roadmap describes.
Way Forward
The Innovation Roadmap 2030 represents a structural shift from the largely defence and civil-nuclear-centred cooperation of earlier decades toward a four-pillar, innovation-and-AI-led partnership with its own governance instruments. Its success over the coming years will depend on converting the nineteen annexed agreements into measurable research, patent, and start-up outcomes; finalising the MRQ expansion so academic-mobility targets have a workable legal basis; and resolving IP-sharing terms for co-development in sensitive sectors before they become a bottleneck. Two structural priorities stand out. First, wider institutional participation: extending Roadmap partnerships beyond the current cluster of IITs and IISc to state universities, NITs, and a broader set of Indian research institutions would both deepen the innovation ecosystem and reduce the risk that gains concentrate narrowly. Second, India-EU integration: aligning the bilateral France track with the wider India-EU relationship, full implementation of the India-EU FTA and successful conclusion of India’s Horizon Europe association by the 2026 target will be central to closing the gap between the Roadmap’s institutional density and its still-modest trade and funding scale, and to letting the France relationship serve its stated function as a bridge into deeper EU-level science and technology engagement.
References
About the Contributor
Shivanshi is a Research and Editorial Intern at the Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI) and a recent graduate in Political Science from Miranda House, University of Delhi. Her research interests include public policy, international relations, and governance.
Acknowledgement
The author extends sincere gratitude to IMPRI India for its valuable guidance and support.
Reviewers
Sruti and Tanisha
Disclaimer
All views expressed in the article belong solely to the author and not necessarily to the organisation.
Read More at IMPRI :
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999.
India Electric Mobility Index 2025: Measuring State-Level Progress in Electric Mobility.
